Blog — Clinical Pathways

Now Available! ICH E6(R3) Comparison Tool. Includes Final Principles, Annex 1, and draft Annex 2. Click here to purchase.

CAPA

FDA Issues Warning Letter Regarding Patient Overdose

FDA Issues Warning Letter Regarding Patient Overdose

10/22/2024

-

On August 20th, 2024 the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a warning letter as a result of an FDA Bioresearch Monitoring (BIMO) Program inspection. The inspection observation was that improper dosing instructions were given to a pediatric patient. Per 21 CFR 312.60, the investigator is responsible for ensuring the study is conducted according to the protocol.

FDA Issues Investigator Warning Letter: Enrollment and IP Administration

11/07/2023

-

On August 8, 2023, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued an investigator Warning Letter to Angela M. Stupi, M.D.. There were multiple deficiencies noted at Dr. Stupi’s clinical site. The site enrolled participants who were ineligible per protocol and did not follow the requirements for administering the investigation product.

Noncompliance with Randomized Blinded Treatment using IRT - Investigator Warning Letter

01/03/2023

-

An investigator was recently issued a warning letter due to noncompliance with the IRT, which can impact the safety of the participants and the quality and integrity of the data. Per protocol, IP was to be administered according to hemoglobin levels and the IRT was to randomize the doses appropriately.

Bye Bye to Five Whys?!

08/16/2022

-

Do you ever wonder why people are not doing what you expect? How do you figure out what went wrong and what constraints are getting in the way of everything working as it should? You may have heard that you need to ask the right question, or even about the Five Whys. But if you have used the Five Whys before, have you noticed that you are not confident in the results?

Investigator Warning Letter: Lapse in IRB Approval

03/15/2022

-

In a recent investigator warning letter issued by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), an investigator was cited for failing to ensure an Institutional Review Board (IRB) that complies with the applicable regulatory requirements in 21 CFR 56 was overseeing their clinical trial. During the time where IRB approval for the protocol lapsed, the site continued to enroll and administer investigational products to study participants under that protocol. The investigator’s response to the FDA was inadequate because they explained that they did not need to report any adverse events during that timeframe.