clinical research

Now Available for Purchase: Overview of ICH E8(R1): General Considerations for Clinical Studies Guideline

02/22/2022

-

ICH E8(R1) is the umbrella guideline that maps to all the ICH “E” family, including ICH E6(R3), Good Clinical Practice. The revision modernizes clinical trial design, planning, management, conduct, and reporting and introduces the idea of quality as data being fit for purpose, which is ensuring the protection of study participants, the integrity of the data and reliability of the results, and the ability of the trials to meet their objectives. The key purpose is to design quality into clinical trials, which is supported by the establishment of an appropriate framework for the identification and review of Critical to Quality factors at the time of design and planning of the study, and throughout its conduct, analysis, and reporting.

IRB Review Still Needed for Deidentified Specimens

11/02/2021

-

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) wrote a letter to industry, “Studies Using Leftover, Deidentified Human Specimens Require IRB Review.” It is a reminder to in vitro diagnostic medical device sponsors that Institutional Review Board (IRB) review is needed for clinical trials on leftover, de-identified human specimens. The 2006 FDA guidance “Guidance on Informed Consent for In Vitro Diagnostic Device Studies Using Leftover Human Specimens that are Not Individually Identifiable” clarifies that informed consent to use leftover human specimens that are not individually identifiable is not required, if it meets exemption criteria from the Investigational Device Exemptions (IDE) regulation (21 CFR 812.2(c)(3)).

Comment Now! FDA Draft Guidance on Investigator Responsibilities for Safety Reporting

10/12/2021

-

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a draft guidance, “Investigator Responsibilities – Safety Reporting for Investigational Drugs and Devices” in September 2021. It combines recommendations from the 2009 procedural final guidance, “Adverse Event Reporting to IRBs - Improving Human Subject Protection” and the investigator responsibilities for adverse event reporting portion of the final guidance from 2012, “Safety Reporting Requirements for INDs and BA/BE Studies”. This draft guidance clarifies how investigators can comply with their regulatory safety reporting requirements and understand when safety data may show reportable issues including serious adverse events (SAEs) or unanticipated adverse device effect (UADE).

Updated Sponsor CPGM: Focus on Remote Monitoring, CRO Oversight, Electronic Systems

9/28/2021

-

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released an updated Compliance Program Guidance Manual (CPGM) for sponsors in September 2021. CPGMs are used to guide FDA inspectors when conducting an inspection for subject protection and data quality and integrity as part of FDA's Bioresearch Monitoring Program (BIMO). Part III, Inspectional, is vastly expanded in line with the current way clinical trials are conducted, including remote monitoring, sponsor’s outsourcing of clinical trial activities, and clinical trials conducted outside the United States. The CPGM increases scrutiny of sponsor processes and procedures related to selection of investigators, electronic systems, and CRO oversight. The following are selected highlights of the changes.

DIGR-ACT® Critical Thinking Focuses on Addressing the Right Issue or Risk at the Right Level – Part 5

9/14/2021

-

What does ‘A’ stand for?

Don't waste time on root cause analysis, at least not if you won’t use the results! Proper root cause analysis takes effort and resources, and you need to use the output to determine actions to try to stop the issue recurring. This is the ‘A’ step of the DIGR-ACT® solution. Having dug into the issue, you now need to ‘Act’ on what you found.